Case of O v. the United Kingdom (2/1986/100/148)
Read Online

Case of O v. the United Kingdom (2/1986/100/148) judgment. by European Court of Human Rights.

  • 372 Want to read
  • ·
  • 21 Currently reading

Published by Council of Europe in Strasbourg .
Written in English


  • O.

Book details:

The Physical Object
Paginationii, 25p. ;
Number of Pages25
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL14317633M

Download Case of O v. the United Kingdom (2/1986/100/148)


Get this from a library! Affaire O. contre Royaume-Uni = Case of O v. the United Kingdom ; Affaire H. contre Royaume-Uni = Case of H v. the United Kingdom.. [O; H.; European Court of Human Rights.]. United Kingdom Crown Dependency Search legal information for the United Kingdom Crown Dependency of Jersey and access government resources for courts and case law, education, government, law journals, law reform, lawyers, legislation, Parliament, criminal law, human rights, and other government and legal information. Feb 01,  · Brief history of law reporting in England and Wales. Prior to case law had been reported by the barristers within court and the reports were named after the people who wrote them and these were known as the nominate reports. The older nominate reports were then reprinted in a series called The English Reports to contain the ‘law’ in one Kate Jackson. Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina lfcmalta.comavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina).

The HUDOC database provides access to the case-law of the Court (Grand Chamber, Chamber and Committee judgments and decisions, communicated cases, advisory opinions and legal summaries from the Case-Law Information Note), the European Commission of Human Rights (decisions and reports) and the Committee of Ministers (resolutions). A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [] UKHL 56 (Belmarsh Case) Key Words. Human Rights Act – Judicial Power – Compatibility – Rule of Law – Declaration of incompatibility – Derogation – Human Rights. Facts. The case concerned the indefinite detention of foreign prisoners in the United Kingdom prison. States not members of the United Nations parties to the Statute. States not parties to the Statute to which the Court may be open. This search engine can be used to search the full text of case-related PDF documents published on this website. To search web pages, please use the site search function. Site search Results 0 Results Home;. Perrin v. the United Kingdom (dec.) (no. /03, ECHR XI) may be - mentioned. The case concerned the applicant’s conviction and sentence for publishing an obscene article on a website. The applicant was a French national living in the United Kingdom. The website was operated and controlled by a company based in the United States of.

In the Cyprus case (Greece v. The United Kingdom ), the Commission declared itself competent to decide whether such a derogation was justified and whether the measures invoked were limited to those “strictly required by the exigencies of the situation”. The Commission stated that the Government should be able to exercise a certain. Decided cases Judgment date Neutral citation Case ID Case name; 19 Feb [] UKSC 6: UKSC / In the matter of an application by Deborah McGuinness for Judicial Review (AP) . If you're seeing this message, that means JavaScript has been disabled on your browser, please enable JS to make this app work. Jul 12,  · Although the use of the margin of appreciation doctrine by the Court has been the subject of criticism, it remains one of the important tools of interpretation regularly used by the Court. The interpretation of the Convention as a living instrument is linked to the role that consensus plays in the margin of appreciation doctrine.